Comments?

Email

princerupert.com

NorthCoast's Regional Information Site

NATURE

Sea, land, river

ECONOMY

Regional

PLACE

Books+

PEOPLES

Community

HOME

Upper burn site	Regeneration
	Here I compare burned and unburned (called “original”)

Using a video image from January 2000, I am able to see what the site looked like before it burned and compare it with present (March 2004)

(see below)

The 2000 image I interpret as having more or less uniform coverage across the upper intertidal shore zone (left to right using arrows – which are also reference points)

The small tufts I suggest are Fucus and these not so prominent in 2004)

Same site before and 4 years later compared

March 21, 2004

Signs of ‘recent’ disturbance

From the Regen area

There are scattered, smallish Fucus plants, some with a green epiphyte (Ulothrix); following the crack upwards we see some small “Mastocarpus” blades. Both take time to return – the epiphyte on Fucus I interpret as meaning the plant is at least 2 years old – the small Mastocarpus is maybe one year old. The Ulva is a weedy green algae which often associated with recent disturbances. Note the Balanus barnacles are uniform size and many are “empty” (the barnacle has died). The even age is also sign of disturbance

	Mastocarpus in cracks
	For what ever reason the regenerated red algae: Mastocarpus as here but also Endocladia are often seen in cracks or fissures --- perhaps cooler, damper and protected from direct sunlight.

But

	Healthier looking
	This “original” is just off the upper side of the “regen” site – the barnacles are mostly alive and not even aged. The Porphyra blades growing on them contrasts with the regen site The Blidingia is probably weedy and may have arrived after the burn cleared the site

Created by LG Wednesday, March 24, 2004