Comments?

Email

e-princerupert.com

Prince Rupert Regional Information Site

For different media reviews of Independent Science panel report see below

NATURE

Sea, land, river

PEOPLES

Community

For earlier materials see Table of Contents

Independent Skeena Science review	Held in Terrace
	Over a hundred people attend

Terry Tebb moderator -- retired from CG and then joined Pacific Salmon Foundation

James Lichatowich —author numerous books
Randall Peterman SFU
John Reynolds SFU and
Dr Carl J Walters at UBC Fisheries center (old file)

	23 Recommendations (see pages 13-15)
	Dr Carl Walters reviews the biology While not meant to replay the 2006 season when fleet fished into August (DFO buckled to political pressure) – still that was what prompted the review --- as returning coho and steelhead are taken in August along with the sockeye

Tail End Loading

above shows steelhead and coho main run in August --- blue dotted line is July 13^th – tail ending (fishing into August) puts steelhead & coho in danger

Sockeye Run about half way on July 13^th

By then DFO managers have a clearer idea how strong the run is going to be --- if they have fished cautiously until then (or the run is later than usual as in 2006) ‘tail end loading’ means fish heavily – this practice had been relied upon less from 1996 to 2002 (above figure) because of coho concerns – but 2005 and especially 2006 where 40% of the run captured in August (above figure) – again put coho (and Steelhead) into danger

	Modeling
	Dr Carl Walters also used 100 years of data to model (‘predict’) what would happen with weaker sockeye runs if fished at same rates the stronger (enhanced) Babine run Some won’t survive—Chris Picard questioned the reliability of data since most non Babine runs poorly sampled etc

	The 2005 Wild Salmon Policy was meant to ‘ensure’ weaker wild runs – like the Chum example left – did not happen --- so where is DFO?
	Wild Salmon Policy 2005 backgrounder – main points – Here is main page for WSP with more links And for ‘I told you so’ see my earlier articles on Chum stocks in Area 5 Area 5 chum overview and And this one for chum diversity And also for 2006 DFO Wild salmon consultations locally –

	While presenters considered Tangle net ‘a no brainer’
	This was almost a running joke of responders – who savaged the tangle net --- and DFO was also sceptical The point being how to ‘avoid’ coho and steelhead etc --- fish ‘selectively’ or somehow release from nets etc – Either approach must be monitored as the ones not complying will get more fish than those losing time trying to save non target species

(--and this is only the first presentation – more tomorrow)

Rob Brown: Skeena Angler on the mandate of DFO and Independent Science Panel (ISP) – Part 2 on the three primary recommendations: >data, WSP wild salmon policy (including steelhead), create Skeena Science Committee	Media Reviews of ISP
	PRDN’s Kris Schumacher emphasizes the responses to recommendations: mainly Dave Peacock’s etc Followed Thursday by MOE response	Watershed Watch has short summary of conclusions and link to Pacific Salmon Forum full report

Created by LG on 13/6/2008

Last updated on Friday, June 13, 2008