|
Comments? Email |
|
NorthCoast's Regional Information
Site |
|
||||
NATURESea, land, river ECONOMYRegional PLACEBooks+ PEOPLESCommunity |
|
|
This was
at least the 3rd time ‘we’ have gone through this material Experts?Models and real information: 26 lakes
were surveyed during nesting
season w radar looking for flying
birds at dawn. That models supposes that if capable trees remain in an area the MaMu will utilize them for nesting. (capable = suitable) From that various “experiments” were done to see how many MaMu remained
after some amount of trees cut --- MaMu would never be endangered if this
model’s assumptions were true, a skeptic might say. . |
||||
|
|
Are all tall
trees suitable??? |
|
Might all
this the battle of the model Here is a
quite elaborate presentation from SFU
mapping out suitability for MaMu nesting using areas around lakes that are “best” for MaMu |
This site even has Diana lake as potentially good habitat---
Note the implication is that all areas are not equal and thus some areas should be protected
|
1 |
1884960 |
JOHNSTON LAKE |
00741LSKE |
|
|
|
High Suitability |
[polygon] |
|
|||
|
1 |
3853720 |
LOWE LAKE |
01119KUMR |
|
|
|
High Suitability |
[polygon] |
9824 |
|||
Red Listed in BC—Where is the Plan??
|
Scientific Name (Source of info) |
English Name |
Status |
Reports |
|||
|
Global |
Subnational |
COSEWIC |
BC Status |
|||
|
|
||||||
|
Brachyramphus
brevirostris |
Kittlitz's
Murrelet |
G3G4 |
SA |
|
ACCIDENTAL |
|
|
Brachyramphus marmoratus |
Marbled Murrelet |
G3G4 |
S2B,S4N |
T (NOV 2000)
|
RED |
|
The MaMu recovery team is aiming at 65% retention of
existing North Coast Marbled Murrelets
It is not apparent how the “New Era” model’s assumptions will work themselves out
in reality
What was in the works:
previous to the “New Era” the NDP planned to protect Marbled Murrelets using
the Forest Practices Code – here was their strategy: you judge which has better
chance of success
Marbled Murrelet
Biological
information and references
Management
information
|
Compare this
‘New Era’ “model” with NDP’s wildlife habitat areas (WHAs) Mountain Goat |
What a
difference a year makes |
|
Take
Mountain Goats—Can’t we take their ‘critical habitat’ (winter feed areas in
this case) and ‘protect them? Not in the New Era it seems. They have a “mocel”
to prove protection is not necessary (not at risk. |
