|
Comments? |
|
Prince Rupert Regional Information Site |
||||
NATURESea, land, river PEOPLESCommunity
|
|
|
Cruise Ship leaving
prompts ‘Community’ effort to spruce up – along with the flowers, suggest
‘buskers’ and Farmers’ Market Tent City Here we look at
Communities in Bloom presentation |
|
|
The
recordings are not up yet |
|
Here
are my times for each session --- can go directly to discussion from 19-26
minutes into ‘recording’ for example |
|
|
Communities
in Bloom |
|
John
Farrell replaces Shawn from 2009
and earlier in 2008 --- Treena Decker wore a flower this
time These
things do turn into a community participation event as shown by this slide
for 2008 participants |

|
|
But the ‘bad
news’ was in 2008 Rupert only earned a 3 of 5 blooms award |
|
I
suggest that given the Sitka Spruce
die off of trees locally --- (not to mention the sewage still going
untreated into the Harbour) – that Rupert not likely to improve upon its 3 of
5 ranking in 2008 --- more later on this |

|
|
Communities in
Bloom rejected by Council in 2009 ---and because of $$ restraints local
committee did not apply in 2010 |
|
At Monday’s Council meeting there was the implication that City Taxpayers were only committing to 750$ entry fee – and a report would be given later on how much other communities spent for their ‘Blooming’ But a closer
reading of their web site
shows council has implicitly ‘committed’ for much more
than 750$ --- including the
travel to the awards conference and the judges 2 day visit – etc Those were
the kinds of things that led to rejection in 2009 ---- As City making the
application – we get the bills too |
|
|
Chris
Proctor defends 1003 3rd Ave West as structurally sound |
|
‘With
a little bit of effort could be cleaned up’ --- plus the co-owner ‘back in
town after an absence of five years’--- New roof and clean up –done in 3
months ---- And the Interior? – ‘Would depend upon our finances at that time
’ ---- So
Council voted for Option One: giving 3 months to spruce the place up ---
We’ll see if the Engineering report ever gets done |

|
|
And the Junk
at the back of place? |
|
‘Oh, you mean the
Treasures’?, shot back Chris To which Gordon
Payne rebutted ‘You are pushing it’ (your good luck) |
|
|
Chris admits
the back part might not be sound |
|
Council
wanted the back porch taken down too etc |
|
|
Image
left form City Agenda package --- showing the back stairs and the ‘Treasures’
more clearly |
|
|
More later
|
|
|
Created by LG on 15/3/2011
Last updated on Wednesday, March 16, 2011