|
|
Prince Rupert Regional Information
Site |
||||
This
was the first lawn I saw mowed but it became common within the next few days
– on right is an Archives map which shows Reserve Lands before McKenna
McBride Commission came through and removed the lands – see my earlier where lands being restored
as covered at last SQCRD meeting |
|
Archives Map of pre cut-off Reserve
lands – in yellow
|
|
|
Along with
the lawn mowing |
|
Another
sign of ‘rate’ that spring is advancing – we have the alders about half open –
and the various Vaccinium species (Huckleberries etc) in full bloom – but
here I show Maianthemum dilatatum (see E-Flora
page) where one of the ‘common names’ is ‘May-lily’ or more usually
‘False lily-of-the-valley’ ---
and it is preparing to bloom (arrow left) |
|
Exercise apparently driven by changes to MSR Regulations
(see BC Waste Water News section
(scroll down) for best links – Federal regs change presumably driving the
rest--- See my earlier where PR looks at
Secondary sewage treatment ) |
SQCRD
looking at using peatlands for disposal of treated wastewater (sewage) |
|
Oona River and Dodge
Cove have had a report done for them by AECOM looking at ‘feasibility of
using the extensive peatlands found on the Central Coast (sic) of BC’. The first phase
AECOM study was a literature review etc which concluded ‘disposing of treated
sewage effluent into peatlands is a viable option for small coastal
communities on the central west coast of British Columbia’ While I have only
had a short period to read the document, the above conclusion was based
largely upon this online
PDF science article Wetland nutrient removal: a review of the evidence
by J. Fisher and MC Acreman, found in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
– Note the title: Wetlands ---
of the 57 wetlands investigated only 4 were peatlands – but the AECOM review
uses the conclusion and tables from Fisher and Acreman to conclude that since
peatlands ‘are capable of removing nitrogen from wastewaters due to their
large carbon stores and their anaerobic conditions’ we should go on to phase
2 of study |
A Short Critique (right)So long as Oona River and
Dodge Cove are paying for these studies (and not PR taxpayers) – who cares? –
It is only when they proceed to stage where actually dumping sewage over on
Digby Island that we should get involved– other than monitoring their studies
etc |
Note
there is a difference between dumping a load of sewage on a bog versus using
bog as ‘end of pipe’ where the wet sewage flow would be more or less
continuous --- bogs are by definition already water saturated – thus one
would expect any new inputs to either displace existing water or simply flow
into nearby sea (residency time etc) – depending upon rainfall, season etc |
Very interesting Science etcOf course Wetlands have
long been used to remove nutrients: Here is a recent journal article in
Ecological Engineering http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.05.009 Nutrient functioning in all three beds varied in a non-linear manner in relation to input nutrient concentrations and water residency time. Possible reasons for the differences in functioning between nitrogen and phosphorus, vegetation types and between seasons are discussed. |
New Directions in Land use? Finding
uses of our extensive Peatlands – or even converting them to more productive
ecosystems by treating them with the nutrients left in Sewage Treatment has
real potential – I recommend the study for local biology courses etc (PDF
mentioned by SQCRD) |
|
I
was told this boat belonged to a recently jailed drug dealer—appropriately named
said the passer-by who told me the story as ‘Pirate Lady’ of some such |
We See
‘Signs of Change’ |
|
|
|
|
That time of
year – ornamental cherries in bloom |
|
Old
timers tell me there were once several different fruit bearing trees (I have
already mentioned apples were once abundant) --- and plan to do a series of
articles on berries, trees etc that remain from a pre-consumer Rupert – when
‘everyone had their own garden’ etc --- Back to Future theme |
|
Who Cares?
All you need to do is have a hot dog handy if Bylaw officer comes around –
open fires for cooking don’t require a Burning Permit (nor does this fellow
apparently) |
These fellows
seem to be burning refuse every other day |
|
Well I suppose that is the problem of
people in Cow Bay or up on 4th East – because Rupert has such good
air circulation (usually) we (City powers that be) don’t pay much attention to
negative health effects of fine particulate matter – see especially PM2.5 which is so small it can pass via lungs into arteries see the Wikipeda
article and links from there |
|
|
More On
spring later |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Created by LG on 23/4/2010
Last updated on Friday, April 23, 2010