|
Comments? |
|
Prince Rupert Regional Information
Site |
||||
NATURESea, land, river PEOPLESCommunity
|
Along with
these bright flowers at their peak performance --- I noticed the good old Skunk
Cabbage peaking through see my previous on ‘Skunk
Cabbage’ |
|
|

|
Derelict
garage deemed a hazard And
underlines the question I asked at meeting – which was ignored |
Demolition
ordered --- 30 days |
|
|

|
|
True it
looks derelict – and perhaps represents a hazard if it would ever start
burning |
|
--
Note first not especially close to any building – presumably fire chief
acting upon a complaint by a neighbour --- but also note does not appear to
be on property – most of building appears to be on city lane way (white
arrow) --- But the main point is what if building on City property – who does
it legally belong to? –Could City be liable for expense tearing it down etc |
|
There
is also the question of undeveloped Lanes – at periods in past if property
owner approached city they would sell owner ˝ the lane – and if ‘neighbor’ did
not want the other half could buy it too – more later |
Treating
Citizens equally? |
|
Which
brings me back to the question of ‘Boulevards’ – or the land between city
street and the actual property boundaries --- at my house on order of 17 feet
--- note this car is parked on boulevard – City property – or more generally
– public property --- I was questioning at Council where one fellow ordered
to remove a pile of wood from his ‘boulevard’ by City --- the point of my
question was if you force him to remove his wood – then what about this car?
--- But question ignored --- I suggest (without going to a lawsuit)—there are
‘solutions’ --- like selling off the land to the property owner for say 100$
plus legal transactions etc – more later |
|
|
Illegal
Burning?? Doesn’t one need a permit? |
|
When I went to see
who was doing this burning – looked to me like it was a City Crew trimming
along Moresby Pond trail A Bylaw officer told me that if I complained to Fire Department --- that the smoke was bothersome etc – that ‘maybe’ even a City worker could be fined --- -- But probably doing what he was instructed to do ---- there are 2 points here --- Like the above examples it looks like rules are there to be ignored – or enforced only if/ when a ‘complaint’ made by some ‘important’ person (not mere plebes like us—more later) The 2nd
point is that the air is assumed to be a free dump site – even by the City |
|
|
More on Equality & Boulevards –
and Dumps later
|
|
|
Created by LG on 25/3/2009
Last updated on Thursday, March 26, 2009