|
Comments? |
|
Prince Rupert Regional Information
Site |
||||
NATURESea, land, river PEOPLESCommunity
|
Storm Front
approaches QCIs- (upper right) with 34 foot waves at center 976 millibar low
--- lower right |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
my earlier on local IPPs around
the Skeena etc |
Take Back
the Power – Presentation PR |
||||
|
Lots
of good information upon potential rip off of both public money and lands ---
Star attraction was Rafe Maier – I will go through the individual
presentations later --- on the negative side --- seemed to be a pro NDP
campaign rally rather than an information session at times ---- thus a
‘watershed election’ coming up provincially --- and kick the Campbell
Liberals out and put in the NDP – who may or may not revoke IPP licenses to
print $$
|
|||||
|
Exempting
Utilities from local Bylaws Idea is that IPP (Independent
Power Producers) fall under purview of Cabinet not municipal |
Links Privatized Power producers (IPP) And here is a Citizen Group
warning about ‘clean
energy’ sic etc – which should make Municipal councils worry |
See the links to the left from a previous article on this subject |
|
|||
|
||||||
|
|
Staff to
research this council’s achievements |
|
It
was one of those requests that sounded inappropriate just before an election –
using staff time to list this councils achievements and what’s left undone But
dog manure on city streets etc – this council passed bylaw to make it illegal
– but never got around to setting a fine for the offence --- for a while City
was enforcing idea that dog owners must pick up after dog – a fine for not
carrying the bag around --- but fine never implemented |
|
Has to be
passed by end of October --- while the inclusion of the Moose generated some
discussion about what measuring stick was being used --- still it seemed
pretty hit and miss (arbitrary) --- thus Museum bookstore etc excluded from
going tax free – but Moose sells liquor to public etc was acceptable --- go
figure |
Tax
exemption |
|
|
|
|
Better
illustration than original |
|
This
rezoning was put off until next meeting I
did not see the image left in the original package – it visualizes the
question I asked at the public input part of the meeting – the land being
sold to D&N Seafood covers 2 roads (suburban streets) etc that were planned for the area --- it
is the road on the right side of image that I had hoped we would hear how its
loss was inconsequential to future development because---- (see map on Oct 14th page) |
|
See my earlier on October 14th
Council meeting |
|
|
|
Created by LG on 23/10/2008
Last updated on Friday, October 24, 2008