|
Comments? |
|
NorthCoast's Regional Information
Site |
||||
NATURESea, land, river ECONOMYRegional PLACEBooks+ PEOPLESCommunity
|
|
|
At 2nd overview – worried
that while this plan has nice sounding phrases and ‘sound bites’ – it falls
short in substance But again public sessions will be crucial – for both comprehension of what
implied and chance to see if willing to change/ modify For me the
biggest problem is lack of public access to waterfront |
|
|
Where are the City Limits? |
|
One
of the ‘smartest’ things done by Mayor Lester was to include Kaien / Watson
Island (pulp mill) and Ridley (?) within city limits of Prince Rupert One
of limitations this plan is that it mainly treats ‘traditional’ city limits =
‘town site area’ in fig left I
suspect this could have long term implications both positive and negative ---
who provides sewage to areas now not hooked into infrastructure etc |

Over
view future land use
– arguably most important map in package
|
Note I have
highlighted/ paralleled the fish bearing stream into
property – I suspect it has been given ‘special’ treatment --- for set backs etc
and I suspect it goes farther into residential area than depicted here -- |
Good detail
of what meant by ‘Oldfield slopes’ |
|
ROYOP Big
box store area |
|
While
this OCP plans to be ‘flexible’ and not prescriptive etc – the rationale for
these scattered ‘Business Commercial’ escapes me—in figure below corner
stores and MacDonalds fast food seem to be the sites—Not sure what it is in
Seal Cove – presumably the pub and not the storage warehouses But these should be
one off—if site redeveloped should have to reapply --- plus if Pub given this
classification then why not re-think this – thus used to be a pub at Fairview
docks area – and if ‘Transport’ hub (discussed later) sited out there – all
the more reason for small commercial areas selected now |
Business Commercial |
|
|

|
|
Let the public speak – and be
interpreted by ‘professionals’
|
|
This OCP prided itself on doing a phone survey to find out what public really wanted instead of what a few loud mouths said it wanted ---- One could have extreme reservations on their methodology – and how it may represent Prince Rupert public’s opinion But for moment lets
use example on left --- trails are a major item in this report – at least say
in comparison to ‘health care’ or affordable housing or assisted living ---
so we are told the public really wants more trails etc – and we will give you
an objective target to be reported upon later (by same consultants
presumably) ---- Like I said ‘I have problems’ with this – though in broad
overview it is a great document – will be put on city web site soon I am told
|
|
|
Here was my first
‘overview’ look at OCP |
|
Created by LG on 9/5/2007
Last updated on Wednesday, May 09, 2007