|
Comments? |
|
NorthCoast's Regional Information
Site |
||||
NATURESea, land, river ECONOMYRegional PLACEBooks+ PEOPLESCommunity
|
Thorkelson
was lone voice on Council when came to questioning TILMA benefits --- At
philosophic level others see ‘free market’ as a good thing while Joy comes
from ‘social justice’ perspective that would have ‘free market’ regulated for
public --- While she mentioned
Burnaby Council study – here are several links she implied |
|
Conversation was
precipitated by Rushton including TILMA in his MOU between Edmonton PG and PR
on Economic Development – see below Thorkelson
thought such decisions should be left to Council --- But she was
lone voice |
|
|
Jim Rushton
Speaks |
|
Announces
the agreement between PR, PG and Edmonton – his discussion emphasized the
potential which new container ship traffic at Rupert has for inducing
manufacturing establishments aimed at Asian markets along the ‘western
corridor’ A
few sparks flew when he disagreed with Thorkelson comments |
|
|
Pond scores
a couple too |
|
Several
times during meeting Pond able to suggest a direction to get council out of a
quandary – often of its own making --- thus on TILMA he suggested it was a
matter best left for UBCM discussion --- and on the ‘Black Rooster’
re-zoning/ building permit he suggested a ‘way out’ – Peter Lester used to do
that sort of thing well – not entering a ‘debate’ until the end – and then
providing summary and exit strategy |
|
Thorkelson
vs Business agenda |
Framing the
debate |
|
Because
the others come from a pro business perspective – Thorkelson often 1 vote
against rest – Bedard will vote with her on many ‘social issues’ |
|
|
|
|
|
Created by LG on
March16, 2007
Last updated on Friday, March 16, 2007